From: Revisit of relationships and models for the Birnbaum-Saunders and inverse-Gaussian distributions
 |  |  | β | α | ν | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | Bias | MSE | Bias | MSE | Bias | MSE |
n=20 | β=1.0 | Method 1 | 0.0386 | 0.1125 | 1.3195 | 7.9982 | 0.1482 | 0.0990 |
 |  | Method 2 | 0.1371 | 0.4192 | 0.0557 | 2.9805 | –0.0424 | 0.0740 |
 |  | Method 3 | 0.0386 | 0.1125 | 0.4002 | 4.6121 | –0.0118 | 0.0910 |
 |  | Method 4 | 0.1371 | 0.4192 | –1.1470 | 3.0691 | –0.3047 | 0.1604 |
 |  | Method 5 | 0.0749 | 0.1563 | 1.6102 | 12.0105 | 0.1629 | 0.1341 |
 | β=1.5 | Method 1 | 0.0741 | 0.2669 | 1.2255 | 6.2592 | 0.1490 | 0.0933 |
 |  | Method 2 | 0.2483 | 0.9636 | 0.0169 | 2.5749 | –0.0439 | 0.0760 |
 |  | Method 3 | 0.0741 | 0.2669 | 0.3387 | 3.8775 | –0.0086 | 0.0843 |
 |  | Method 4 | 0.2483 | 0.9636 | –1.1137 | 3.0016 | –0.2946 | 0.1566 |
 |  | Method 5 | 0.0736 | 0.2879 | 1.8437 | 14.1580 | 0.1863 | 0.1367 |
 | β=0.5 | Method 1 | 0.0300 | 0.0311 | 1.1648 | 6.3143 | 0.1345 | 0.0929 |
 |  | Method 2 | 0.0830 | 0.1013 | 0.0232 | 2.9223 | –0.0484 | 0.0799 |
 |  | Method 3 | 0.0300 | 0.0311 | 0.2871 | 3.8638 | –0.0234 | 0.0886 |
 |  | Method 4 | 0.0830 | 0.1013 | –1.0694 | 3.2768 | –0.2920 | 0.1621 |
 |  | Method 5 | 0.0712 | 0.2610 | 1.7594 | 12.6750 | 0.1843 | 0.1315 |
n=40 | β=1.0 | Method 1 | 0.0283 | 0.0510 | 0.4013 | 1.8797 | 0.0427 | 0.0391 |
 |  | Method 2 | 0.0675 | 0.1607 | –0.1425 | 1.3239 | –0.0564 | 0.0424 |
 |  | Method 3 | 0.0283 | 0.0510 | –0.0800 | 1.4982 | –0.0522 | 0.0469 |
 |  | Method 4 | 0.0675 | 0.1607 | –0.9059 | 2.0129 | –0.2316 | 0.1069 |
 |  | Method 5 | 0.0253 | 0.0554 | 0.6419 | 2.4061 | 0.0782 | 0.0458 |
 | β=1.5 | Method 1 | 0.0386 | 0.1025 | 0.5161 | 1.9371 | 0.0593 | 0.0384 |
 |  | Method 2 | 0.1448 | 0.4378 | –0.0506 | 1.2901 | –0.0414 | 0.0429 |
 |  | Method 3 | 0.0386 | 0.1025 | 0.0286 | 1.5041 | –0.0350 | 0.0453 |
 |  | Method 4 | 0.1448 | 0.4378 | –0.8061 | 1.8517 | –0.2089 | 0.0993 |
 |  | Method 5 | 0.0369 | 0.1242 | 0.6034 | 2.3951 | 0.0697 | 0.0439 |
 | β=0.5 | Method 1 | 0.0111 | 0.0126 | 0.5099 | 2.0122 | 0.0580 | 0.0370 |
 |  | Method 2 | 0.0450 | 0.0478 | –0.0599 | 1.4283 | –0.0459 | 0.0443 |
 |  | Method 3 | 0.0111 | 0.0126 | 0.0191 | 1.5585 | –0.0372 | 0.0440 |
 |  | Method 4 | 0.0450 | 0.0478 | –0.8308 | 2.0662 | –0.2190 | 0.1056 |
 |  | Method 5 | 0.0121 | 0.0142 | 0.7498 | 2.9983 | 0.0894 | 0.0511 |
n=60 | β=1.0 | Method 1 | 0.0101 | 0.0312 | 0.3484 | 1.2761 | 0.0380 | 0.0300 |
 |  | Method 2 | 0.0454 | 0.1185 | –0.0580 | 0.9684 | –0.0351 | 0.0315 |
 |  | Method 3 | 0.0101 | 0.0312 | 0.0024 | 1.0757 | –0.0282 | 0.0327 |
 |  | Method 4 | 0.0454 | 0.1185 | –0.6773 | 1.4934 | –0.1730 | 0.0763 |
 |  | Method 5 | 0.0117 | 0.0341 | 0.4055 | 1.3271 | 0.0490 | 0.0275 |
 | β=1.5 | Method 1 | 0.0288 | 0.0703 | 0.2911 | 0.9903 | 0.0348 | 0.0239 |
 |  | Method 2 | 0.0813 | 0.2419 | –0.0925 | 0.7792 | –0.0361 | 0.0269 |
 |  | Method 3 | 0.0288 | 0.0703 | –0.0473 | 0.8886 | –0.0320 | 0.0278 |
 |  | Method 4 | 0.0813 | 0.2419 | –0.6837 | 1.3505 | –0.1694 | 0.0701 |
 |  | Method 5 | 0.0366 | 0.0835 | 0.3219 | 1.1432 | 0.0369 | 0.0272 |
 | β=0.5 | Method 1 | 0.0120 | 0.0091 | 0.3565 | 1.1113 | 0.0423 | 0.0255 |
 |  | Method 2 | 0.0365 | 0.0323 | –0.0721 | 0.8640 | –0.0365 | 0.0296 |
 |  | Method 3 | 0.0120 | 0.0091 | 0.0150 | 0.9128 | –0.0228 | 0.0269 |
 |  | Method 4 | 0.0365 | 0.0323 | –0.6760 | 1.3800 | –0.1699 | 0.0720 |
 |  | Method 5 | 0.0051 | 0.0081 | 0.3621 | 1.2234 | 0.0432 | 0.0260 |