Skip to main content

Table 2 Likelihood ratio tests comparing the two-component models

From: Alternative approaches for econometric modeling of panel data using mixture distributions

 

\(\mathcal {M}_{1}\) vs \(\mathcal {M}_{2}\)

\(\mathcal {M}_{2}\) vs \(\mathcal {M}_{3}\)

\(\mathcal {M}_{1}\) vs \(\mathcal {M}_{5}\)

\(\mathcal {M}_{2}\) vs \(\mathcal {M}_{6}\)

\(\mathcal {M}_{5}\) vs \(\mathcal {M}_{6}\)

Likelihood ratio

1833.337

19.504

1890.253

767.080

710.163

Degrees of freedom

7.000

2.000

9.000

2.000

7.000

pvalue

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

  1. Notes: These are regular likelihood ratio tests. The likelihood ratio is 2*(L 2−L 1) where L 2 is the log-likelihood of the bigger model and L 1, the log-likelihood of the smaller model. Under the null hypothesis that the smaller model is true, this statistic has a χ 2(k 2−k 1) distribution where k 2 is the number of parameters from the bigger model and k 1, the number of parameters from the smaller model