Table 4 A comparison of feature importances for random forest model and boosting trees
From: Spatio-temporal analysis of flood data from South Carolina
Watershed | Random Forest | Boosting Trees |
|---|---|---|
Santee | 0.0229 | 0.1751 |
Lower Pee Dee | 0.0327 | 0.0133 |
Savannah | 0.0439 | 0.0245 |
Edisto SC Coastal | 0.0042 | 0.0441 |