Research | Open | Published:

# Characterizations of folded student’s *t* distribution

*Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications***volume 2**, Article number: 15 (2015)

## Abstract

A probability distribution can be characterized through various methods. In this paper, we have established some new characterizations of folded Student’s *t* distribution by truncated first moment, order statistics and upper record values. It is hoped that the results will be quite useful in the fields of probability, statistics, and other applied sciences.

## 1. Introduction

Characterization of a probability distribution plays an important role in probability and statistics. Before a particular probability distribution model is applied to fit the real world data, it is necessary to confirm whether the given continuous probability distribution satisfies the underlying requirements by its characterization. A probability distribution can be characterized through various methods (see, for example, Ahsanullah et al. (2014), among others). Since the characterizations of probability distributions play an important part in the determination of distributions by using certain properties in the given data, there has been a great interest, in recent years, in the characterizations of probability distributions by truncated moments. For example, the development of the general theory of the characterizations of probability distributions by truncated moment began with the work of Galambos and Kotz (1978). Further development continued with the contributions of many authors and researchers, among them Kotz and Shanbhag (1980), Glänzel et al. (1984), and Glänzel (1987) are notable. Most of these characterizations are based on a simple relationship between two different moments truncated from the left at the same point. As pointed out by Glänzel (1987), these characterizations may serve as a basis for parameter estimation. The characterizations by truncated moments may also be useful in developing some goodness-of-fit tests of distributions by using data whether they satisfy certain properties given in the characterizations of distributions. For example, as pointed out by Kim and Jeon (2013), in actuarial science, the credibility theory proposed by Bühlmann (1967) allows actuaries to estimate the conditional mean loss for a given risk to establish an adequate premium to cover the insured’s loss. In their paper, Kim and Jeon (2013) have proposed a credibility theory based on truncation of the loss data, or the trimmed mean, which also contains the classical credibility theory of Bühlmann (1967) as a special case. It appears from the literature that not much attention has been paid to the characterization of the folded Student’s *t* distribution with *n* degrees of freedom. For the folded Student’s *t* distribution with *n* = 2 degrees of freedom, the interested readers are referred to Ahsanullah et al. (2014). In this paper, motivated by the importance of the Student’s *t* distribution in many practical problems when only the magnitudes of deviations are recorded and the signs of the deviations are ignored, we have established some new characterizations of folded Student’s *t* distribution by truncated first moment, order statistics and upper record values, which, we hope, will be useful for practitioners and researchers in the fields of probability, statistics, and other applied sciences, such as, actuarial science, economics, finance, among others.

The organization of this paper is as follows. Section 2 discusses briefly the folded Student’s *t* distribution and some of its properties. The characterizations of the folded Student’s *t* distribution are presented in section 3. The concluding remarks are provided in Section 4. We have provided two lemmas in Appendix A (as Lemma A.1 and Lemma A.2) to prove the main results of the paper.

## 2. Folded student’s *t* distribution and its distributional properties

In this section, we briefly discuss the folded Student’s *t* distribution and some of its distributional properties.

### 2.1 Folded student’s *t* distribution

An important class of probability distributions, known as the folded distributions, arises in many practical problems when only the magnitudes of deviations are recorded, and the signs of the deviations are ignored. The folded Student’s *t* distribution is one such probability distribution which belongs to this class. It is related to the Student’s *t* distribution in the sense that if *Y* is a distributed random variable having Student’s *t* distribution, then the random variable *X* = |*Y*| is said to have a folded Student’s *t* distribution. The distribution is called folded because the probability mass (that is, area) to the left of the point *x* = 0 is folded over by taking the absolute value. As pointed out above, such a case may be encountered if only the magnitude of some random variable is recorded, without taking into consideration its sign (that is, its direction). Further, this distribution is used when the measurement system produces only positive measurements, from a normally distributed process. The folded Student’s *t* distribution was developed by Psarakis and Panaretoes (1990). For details on the folded Student’s *t* distribution, see Johnson et al. (1994). For some bivariate extension of the folded Student’s *t* distribution, the interested readers are referred to Psarakis and Panaretos (2001). Recently, many researchers have studied the statistical methods dealing with the properties and applications of the folded Student’s *t* distribution, among them Brazauskas and Kleefeld (2011, 2014), and Scollnik (2014), are notable.

**Definition:** Let *Y* be a random variable having the Student’s *t* distribution with *n* degrees of freedom. Let *X* = |*Y*|. Then *X* has a folded Student’s *t* distribution with *n* degrees of freedom and its pdf *f*
_{
X
}(*x*) is given by

where *B* (., .) denotes the beta function; see, for example, Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (1980), among others. To describe the shapes of the folded Student’s *t* distribution, the plots of the pdf (1) for some values of the parameter *n* are provided in Fig. 1. The effects of the parameter can easily be seen from these graphs. Similar plots can be drawn for others values of the parameters.

### 2.2 Moment of folded student’s *t* distribution

For *n* = 1, *E* (*X*) and *E* (*X*
^{2}) do not exist for the folded Student’s *t* distribution having the pdf (1). When *n* > 1, the mean, *E* (*X*), the second moment, *E* (*X*
^{2}), and the variance, *Var* (*X*), for the folded Student’s *t* distribution having the pdf (1), are respectively given as follows (see, for example, Psarakis & Panaretoes (1990)):

and

where Γ(.) denotes the gamma function. Now, noting the following well-known asymptotic relation

for real *α* and *x*, see, for example, Wendel (1948), and Abramowitz and Stegun (1970), page 257, 6.1.46, among others, and using this in the above expressions (2) and (3) for *E* (*X*) and *Var* (*X*) respectively, it can easily be seen that, in the limit, we have the following:

and

For more distributional properties of folded Student’s *t* distribution, the interested readers are referred to Psarakis and Panaretoes (1990), and Johnson et al. (1994), among others.

## 3. Characterization of folded student’s *t* distribution

In this section, we present some new characterizations of folded Student’s *t* distribution by truncated first moment, order statistics and upper record values, as given below.

### 3.1 Characterization by truncated first moment

The characterizations of folded Student’s *t* distribution by truncated first moment are provided below.

**Assumption 3.1:** Suppose the random variable *X* is absolutely continuous with the cumulative distribution function *F*(*x*) and the probability density function *f*(*x*). We assume that *γ* = inf { *x* | *F* (*x*) > 0} , and *δ* = sup { *x* | *F* (*x*) < 1} . We also assume that *E*(*X*) exists.

**Theorem 3.1.1:** If the random variable *X* satisfies the Assumption 3.1 with *γ* = 0 and *δ* = ∞, then *E* (*X*|*X* ≤ *x*) = *g* (*x*) *τ* (*x*), where \( \tau\;(x)\kern0.5em =\frac{f(x)}{F\;(x)} \) and \( g\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{n}{n\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}\;\left[{\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{x^2}{n}\right)}^{\frac{n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1}{2}}\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em \left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{x^2}{n}\right)\right], \) if and only if *X* has the folded Student’s *t* distribution with the pdf as given in Eq. (1).

**Proof:** Suppose that *E* (*X*|*X* ≤ *x*) = *g* (*x*) *τ* (*x*). Then, since \( E\;\left(X\left|X\kern0.5em \le \kern0.5em x\right.\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_0^xu\;f\;(u)\;du}}{F\;(x)}, \) and \( \tau\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{F\;(x)}, \) we have \( g\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_0^xu\;f\;(u)\;du}}{f\;(x)}. \) Now, if the random variable *X* satisfies the Assumption 3.1 and has the folded Student’s *t* distribution as given in Eq. (1), then, after simplification, we have

Conversely, suppose that \( g\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{n}{n\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}\;\left[{\left(1\kern0.3em +\kern0.3em \frac{x^2}{n}\right)}^{\frac{n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1}{2}}\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em \left(1\kern0.3em +\kern0.3em \frac{x^2}{n}\right)\right]. \) Then, after differentiation, we have

Using the above expressions for *g* (*x*) and *g*
^{/}(*x*), after simplification, we obtain

Consequently, by using Lemma A.1, we obtain

On integrating the above equation with respect to *x*, we obtain

\( f\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em c\;{\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.3em \frac{x^2}{n}\right)}^{-\frac{n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1}{2}}, \) where *c* is a constant to be determined.

On integrating the above equation with respect to *x* from *x* = 0 to *x* = ∞, and using the condition \( {\displaystyle {\int}_0^{\infty }f\;(x)\;dx=1,} \) and noting the integral representation of beta function, that is, \( B\;\left(u,\kern0.5em v\right)\kern0.3em =\kern0.3em {\displaystyle \underset{0}{\overset{\infty }{\int }}\frac{t^{u\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}}{{\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em t\right)}^{u\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em v}}}dt,\kern0.62em u>0,\kern0.5em v>0, \) (see, Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (1980), Eq. 8.380.3, Page 948), we obtain \( c\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{2}{\sqrt{n}\;B\;\left(\frac{n}{2},\kern0.5em \frac{1}{2}\right)}, \) and thus \( {f}_X(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{2\;}{\;\sqrt{n\;}\kern0.5em B\;\left(\frac{n}{2},\kern0.5em \frac{1}{2}\right)}{\left(1+\frac{x^2}{n}\right)}^{\frac{-\left(n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1\right)}{2}}\kern0.5em ,\kern1.5em x\kern0.5em >\kern0.5em 0, \) which is the pdf of folded Student’s *t* distribution with *n* degrees of freedom. This completes the proof.

**Special Case:** By taking *n* = 3 in Theorem 3.1.1, it is easy to see that, for an absolutely continuous (with respect to Lebesgue measure) non-negative random variable *X* with cdf *F* (*x*) and pdf *f* (*x*), we have *E* (*X*|*X* ≤ *x*) = *g* (*x*) *τ* (*x*), where \( g\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{x^2\;\left({x}^2+3\right)}{6}, \) and *τ*(*x*) is the reversed hazard rate function given by \( \tau (x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{F\;(x)}, \) if and only if *X* has the folded Student’s *t*
_{3} distribution with the pdf \( f\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{2}{\pi \sqrt{3}}\;{\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{x^2}{3}\right)}^{-2}, \kern1em x\kern0.5em >\kern0.5em 0. \)

**Theorem 3.1.2:** If the random variable *X* satisfies the Assumption 3.1 with *γ* = 0 and *δ* = ∞, then \( E\;\left(X\left|X\ge \kern0.5em x\right.\right)=\tilde{g}(x)\;r(x), \) where \( r(x)=\frac{f\;(x)}{1-F\;(x)} \) and \( \tilde{g}(x)=\frac{n}{n-1}\;\left(1+\frac{x^2}{n}\right), \) if and only if *X* has the folded Student’s *t* distribution with the pdf as given in Eq. (1).

**Proof:** Suppose that \( E\;\left(X\left|X\kern0.5em \ge \kern0.5em x\right.\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \tilde{g}(x)\;r(x). \) Then, since \( E\;\left(X\left|X\kern0.5em \ge \kern0.5em x\right.\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_x^{\infty }u\;f\;(u)\;du}}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)} \) and \( r(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)}, \) we have \( \tilde{g}\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_x^{\infty }u\;f\;(u)\;du}}{f\;(x)}. \) Now, if the random variable *X* satisfies the Assumption 3.1 and has the folded Student’s *t* distribution as given in Eq. (1), then, after simplification, we have

Conversely, suppose that \( \tilde{g}(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{n}{n\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}\;\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{x^2}{n}\right). \) Then, after differentiation, we have

Using the above expressions for \( \tilde{g}\;(x) \) and \( {\left(\tilde{g}(x)\right)}^{/}, \) after simplification, we obtain

Consequently, by using Lemma A.2, we have

On integrating the above equation with respect to *x*, we obtain

\( f\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em c\;{\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{x^2}{n}\right)}^{-\frac{n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1}{2}}, \) where *c* is a constant to be determined.

On integrating the above equation with respect to *x* from *x* = 0 to *x* = ∞, and noting that \( {\displaystyle {\int}_0^{\infty }f(x)dx=1,} \) and \( B\;\left(u,\kern0.5em v\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em {\displaystyle \underset{0}{\overset{\infty }{\int }}\frac{t^{u\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}}{{\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em t\right)}^{u\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em v}}dt},\kern0.62em u>0,\kern0.5em v>0, \) we obtain \( c\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{2}{\sqrt{n}\;B\;\left(\frac{n}{2},\kern0.5em \frac{1}{2}\right)}, \) and thus \( {f}_X(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{2\;}{\;\sqrt{n\;}\kern0.5em B\;\left(\frac{n}{2},\kern0.5em \frac{1}{2}\right)}{\left(1+\frac{x^2}{n}\right)}^{\frac{-\left(n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1\right)}{2}}\kern0.5em ,\kern1.5em x>0, \) which is the pdf of folded Student’s *t* distribution with *n* degrees of freedom. This completes the proof.

**Note:** It is interesting to point out here that there is connection between Theorem 3.1.1 and Theorem 3.1.2. For example, since, as in Theorem 3.1.1 and Theorem 3.1.2, \( g\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_0^xu\;f\;(u)\;du}}{f\;(x)} \) and \( \tilde{g}\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_x^{\infty }u\;f\;(u)\;du}}{f\;(x)} \) respectively, we have \( g\;(x)\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \tilde{g}\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_0^{\infty }u\;f\;(u)\;du}}{f\;(x)}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{E\;(X)\;}{f\;(x)}. \) that is,

where *E* (*X*) denotes the mean, as given in Eq. (2), of folded Student’s *t* distribution with the pdf (1). Thus, using the expressions for *f* (*x*) as in Eq. (1), and for *E* (*X*) as in Eq. (2), respectively, we can easily derive the formulas for *g* (*x*) or \( \tilde{g}\;(x) \) when *X* follows the folded Student’s *t* distribution.

### 3.2 Characterization by order statistics

The characterizations of folded Student’s *t* distribution by order statistics are provided in Theorem 3.2.1 and Theorem 3.2.2 below. We will consider the pdf *f* (*x*) of the folded Student’s *t* distribution as given in Eq. (1). Let *X*
_{1}, *X*
_{2}, … , *X*
_{
n
} be *n* independent copies of the random variable *X* having absolutely continuous distribution function *F*(*x*) and pdf *f* (*x*). Suppose that *X*
_{1, n
} ≤ *X*
_{2, n
} ≤ … ≤ *X*
_{
n, n
} are the corresponding order statistics. It is known that *X*
_{
j, n
}|*X*
_{
k, n
} = *x*, for 1 ≤ *k* < *j* ≤ *n*, is distributed as the (*j* − *k*) *th* order statistics from (*n* − *k*) independent observations from the random variable *V* having the pdf *f*
_{
V
} (*v*|*x*) where \( {f}_V\;\left(v\Big|x\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(v)}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)},\kern0.5em 0\kern0.5em \le \kern0.5em v\kern0.5em <\kern0.5em x, \) see, for example, Ahsanullah et al. (2013), Chapter 5, or Arnold et al. (2005), Chapter 2, among others. Further, *X*
_{
i.,n
}|*X*
_{
k, n
} = *x*, 1 ≤ *i* < *k* ≤ *n*, is distributed as *ith* order statistics from *k* independent observations from the random variable *W* having the pdf *f*
_{
W
}(*w*|*x*) where \( {f}_W\;\left(w\Big|x\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(w)}{F\;(x)},\kern0.36em w<x. \) We assume that \( {S}_{k-1}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{1}{k\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}\left({X}_{1,\;n}+{X}_{2,\;n}+\kern0.5em \dots \kern0.5em +{X}_{k-1,\;n}\right), \) and \( {T}_{k,\;n}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{1}{n\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em k}\;\left({X}_{k+1,\;n}+{X}_{k+2,\;n}+\kern0.5em \dots \kern0.5em +{X}_{n.n}\right). \)

**Theorem 3.2.1:** Suppose the random variable *X* satisfies the Assumption 3.1 with *γ* = 0 and *δ* = ∞, then *E* (*S*
_{
k − 1}|*X*
_{
k, n
} = *x*) = *g* (*x*) *τ* (*x*), where \( g\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{n}{n\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}\;\left[{\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{x^2}{n}\right)}^{\frac{n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1}{2}}\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em \left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{x^2}{n}\right)\right] \) and \( \tau\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{F\;(x)}, \) if and only if *X* has the folded Student’s *t* distribution with the pdf as given in Eq. (1).

**Proof:** Since \( E\;\left({S}_{k\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}\Big|{X}_{k,\;n}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em x\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_0^xu\;f\;(u)\;du}}{F\;(x)}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em E\;\left(X\left|X\kern0.5em \le \kern0.5em x\right.\right), \) the proof of Theorem 3.2.1 follows from Theorem 3.1.1.

**Theorem 3.2.2:** Suppose the random variable *X* satisfies the Assumption 3.1 with *γ* = 0 and *δ* = ∞, then \( E\;\left({T}_{k,\;n}\Big|{X}_{k,\;n}=x\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \tilde{g}(x)\;r(x), \) where \( r(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)} \) and \( \tilde{g}(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{n}{n\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}\;\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{x^2}{n}\right), \) if and only if *X* has the folded Student’s *t* distribution with the pdf as given in Eq. (1).

**Proof:** Since \( E\;\left({T}_{k,\;n}\Big|{X}_{k,\;n}=x\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_x^{\infty }u\;f\;(u)\;du}}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em E\;\left(X\left|X\kern0.5em \ge \kern0.5em x\right.\right), \) the proof follows from Theorem 3.1.2.

### 3.3 Characterization by upper record values

In this section, we will establish a theorem on the characterization of the folded Student’s *t* distribution by upper record values. Suppose that *X*
_{1}, *X*
_{2}, … is a sequence of independent and identically distributed absolutely continuous random variables with distribution function *F* (*x*) and pdf *f*(*x*). Let *Y*
_{
n
} = max (*X*
_{1}, *X*
_{2}, … , *X*
_{
n
}) for *n* ≥ 1. We say that *X*
_{
j
} is an upper record value of {*X*
_{
n
}, *n* ≥ 1} if *Y*
_{
j
} > *Y*
_{
j − 1}, *j* > 1. The indices at which the upper records occur are given by the record times { *U* (*n*) > min(*j* | *j* > *U*(*n* − 1), *X*
_{
j
} > *X*
_{
U(n − 1)}, *n* > 1) } and *U*(1) = 1. We will denote the *nth* upper record value as *X* (*n*) = *X*
_{
U(n)}. The pdf of *X* (*n*) is given by

where *R* (*x*) = − ln (1 − *F*(*x*)) denotes the cumulative hazard rate function. The joint pdf *f*
_{
n , n + 1} (*x* , *y*) of *X* (*n*) and *X* (*n* + 1) is given by (see Ahsanullah (1995), page 4)

where \( r\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{d\;R\;(x)}{d\;x}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)} \) denotes the hazard rate function. Thus, the conditional pdf *f*
_{
n + 1 , n
} (*y* | *x* ) of *X*(*n* + 1)|*X*(*n*) = *x* is \( {f}_{n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1, \kern0.5em n\;}\left(y\kern0.5em \Big|\kern0.5em x\;\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f_{n, \kern0.5em n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1\ }\left(x, \kern0.5em y\right)}{f_{n\ }(x)}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(y)}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)}. \) Based on these results, we now have the characterization of folded Student’s *t* distribution by upper record values, as provided in Theorem 3.3.1 below. We will consider the pdf *f* (*x*) of the folded Student’s *t* distribution as given in Eq. (1).

**Theorem 3.3.1:** Suppose the random variable *X* satisfies the Assumption 3.1 with *γ* = 0 and *δ* = ∞. Then *X* has the folded Student’s *t* distribution with *n* degrees of freedom if and only if

\( E\;\left(X\left(n+1\right)\Big|X(n)=x\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \tilde{g}(x)\;r(x), \) where \( r(x)=\frac{f\;(x)}{1-F\;(x)} \) and \( \tilde{g}(x)\kern0.5em =\frac{n}{n\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 1}\;\left(1\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{x^2}{n}\right). \)

**Proof:** Since, as shown above, \( {f}_{n\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 1, \kern0.5em n\;}\left(y\kern0.5em \Big|\kern0.5em x\;\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(y)}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)}, \) it follows that

And, hence, the proof of Theorem 3.3.1 follows from Theorem 3.1.2.

## 4. Concluding remarks

Characterization of a probability distribution plays an important role in probability and statistics, and other applied sciences. Before a particular probability distribution model is applied to fit the real world data, it is necessary to confirm whether the given probability distribution satisfies the underlying requirements by its characterization. A probability distribution can be characterized through various methods. Since the characterizations of probability distributions by truncated moments play an important part in the determination of distributions by using certain properties in the given data, in this paper we have established some new characterizations of folded Student’s *t* distribution by truncated first moment, order statistics and upper record values. It is hoped that the findings of the paper will be useful for researchers in the fields of probability, statistics, and other applied sciences.

## References

Abramowitz, M, Stegun, IA: Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. (1970)

Ahsanullah, M: Record statistics. Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA (1995)

Ahsanullah, M, Nevzorov, VB, Shakil, M: An introduction to order statistics. Atlantis-Press, Paris, France (2013)

Ahsanullah, M, Kibria, BMG, Shakil, M: Normal and student’s t distributions and their applications. Atlantis Press, Paris, France (2014a)

Ahsanullah, M, Hamedani, GHG, Kibria, BMG, Shakil, M: On characterizations of certain continuous distributions. J. Stat.

**21**, 75–89 (2014b)Arnold, BC, Balakrishnan, N, Nagaraja, HN: First course in order statistics. Wiley, New York, USA (2005)

Brazauskas, V, Kleefeld, A: Folded and log-folded

*t*distributions as models for insurance loss data. Scand. Actuar. J.**1**, 59–74 (2011)Brazauskas, V, Kleefeld, A: Authors’ reply to “Letter to the Editor: regarding folded models and the paper by Brazauskas and Kleefeld (2011)”. Scand. Actuar. J.

**2014**(8), 753–757 (2014)Bühlmann, H: Experience rating and credibility. Astin. Bull.

**4**(03), 199–207 (1967)Galambos, J, Kotz, S: Characterizations of probability distributions. A unified approach with an emphasis on exponential and related models, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, p. 675. Springer, Berlin (1978)

Glänzel, W: A characterization theorem based on truncated moments and its application to some distribution families,

*Mathematical Statistics and Probability Theory*(Bad Tatzmannsdorf, 1986), Vol. B, 75 – 84. Reidel, Dordrecht (1987)Glänzel, W, Telcs, A, Schubert, A: Characterization by truncated moments and its application to Pearson-type distributions. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete

**66**, 173–183 (1984)Gradshteyn, IS, Ryzhik, IM: Table of integrals, series, and products. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, USA (1980)

Johnson, NL, Kotz, S, Balakrishnan, N: Continuous univariate distributions, vol. 1, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA (1994)

Kim, JH, Jeon, Y: Credibility theory based on trimming. Insur. Math. Econ.

**53**(1), 36–47 (2013)Kotz, S, Shanbhag, DN: Some new approaches to probability distributions. Adv. Appl. Probab.

**12**, 903–921 (1980)Psarakis, S, Panaretoes, J: The folded

*t*distribution. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods**19**(7), 2717–2734 (1990)Psarakis, S, Panaretos, J: On some bivariate extensions of the folded normal and the folded

*t*distributions. J. Appl. Stat. Sci.**10**(2), 119–136 (2001)Scollnik, DPM: Letter to the Editor: regarding folded models and the paper by Brazauskas and Kleefeld (2011). Scand. Actuar. J.

**2014**(3), 278–281 (2014)Wendel, JG: Note on the gamma function. Am. Math. Mon.

**55**(9), 563–564 (1948)

## Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the editor and the two anonymous reviewers whose constructive comments and suggestions have improved the quality and presentation of the paper. Further, part of the paper was completed while the second author, M. Shakil, visited Professor M. Ahsanullah, Rider University, NJ, USA, during the Summer of 2013, and took independent studies with him. He is also grateful to Miami Dade College for all the support, including tuition grants. The third author, B. M. Golam Kibria, is grateful to his brother, B. M. Golam Kabir, and sister-in-law, Mrs. Tazia Kabir, for their love and constant inspirations throughout his career.

### Declarations

We confirm that we have read Springer Open’s guidance on competing interests and have included a statement indicating that none of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript.

## Author information

## Additional information

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authors’ contributions

MA contributed to the properties and characterizations of folded student’s *t* distribution, and participated in the draft of the manuscript. MS contributed to the studies of properties, graph and characterizations of folded student’s distribution, drafted the manuscript, and participated in the sequence alignment. GK contributed to the properties and graph of folded student’s t distribution, and participated in the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

## Appendix A

### Appendix A

Here, we establish the following two lemmas (Lemma A.1 and Lemma A.2) which have been useful in proving our main results in Section 3.

### Lemma A.1

Under the Assumption 3.1, if *E* (*X* | *X* ≤ *x*) = *g* (*x*) *τ* (*x*), where \( \tau\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{F\;(x)} \) and *g* (*x*) is a continuous differentiable function of *x* with the condition that \( {\displaystyle {\int}_0^x\frac{u\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em {g}^{/}(u)}{g(u)}\;du} \) is finite for *x* > 0, then \( f\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em c\;{e}^{{\displaystyle {\int}_0^x\frac{u\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em {g}^{/}(u)}{g\;(u)}\;du}}, \) where *c* is a constant determined by the condition \( {\displaystyle {\int}_0^{\infty }f(x)dx\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em 1} \).

**Proof:** Suppose that *E* (*X*|*X* ≤ *x*) = *g* (*x*) *τ* (*x*). Then, since \( E\;\left(X\left|X\kern0.5em \le \kern0.5em x\right.\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_0^xu\;f\;(u)\;du}}{F\;(x)} \) and \( \tau\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{F\;(x)}, \) we have \( g\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_0^xu\;f\;(u)\;du}}{f\;(x)}, \) that is, \( {\displaystyle {\int}_0^xu\;f\;(u)\;du=f\;(x)\;g\;(x).} \)

Differentiating both sides of the above equation with respect to *x*, we obtain

From the above equation, we obtain

On integrating the above equation with respect to *x*, we have

where *c* is obtained by the condition \( {\displaystyle {\int}_0^{\infty }}f(x)dx=1. \) This completes the proof of Lemma A.1.

### Lemma A.2

Under the Assumption 3.1, if \( E\;\left(X\kern0.24em \Big|\kern0.24em X\kern0.5em \ge \kern0.5em x\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \tilde{g}\;(x)\;r\;(x), \) where \( r\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)} \) and \( \tilde{g}\;(x) \) is a continuous differentiable function of *x* with the condition that \( {\displaystyle {\int}_x^{\infty}\frac{u\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\left[\tilde{g}\;(u)\right]}^{/}}{\tilde{g}\;(u)}\;du} \) is finite for *x* > 0, then \( f(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em c\;{e}^{-{\displaystyle {\int}_0^x\frac{u\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\left[\tilde{g}\;(u)\right]}^{/}}{\tilde{g}\;(u)}\;du,}} \) where *c* is a constant determined by the condition \( {\displaystyle {\int}_0^{\infty }f(x)dx\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em 1.} \)

**Proof:** Suppose that \( E\;\left(X\;\left|\;X\kern0.5em \ge \kern0.5em x\right.\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \tilde{g}(x)\;r(x). \) Then, since \( E\;\left(X\;\left|\;X\kern0.5em \ge \kern0.5em x\right.\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_x^{\infty }u\;f\;(u)\;du}}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)} \) and \( r(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{f\;(x)}{1\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em F\;(x)}, \) we have \( \tilde{g}\;(x)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\displaystyle {\int}_x^{\infty }u\;f\;(u)\;du}}{f\;(x)}, \) that is, \( {\displaystyle {\int}_x^{\infty }u\;f\;(u)\;du=f\;(x)\tilde{g}\;(x).} \)

Differentiating the above equation with respect to respect to *x*, we obtain

From the above equation, we obtain

On integrating the above equation with respect to *x*, we have

where *c* is obtained by the condition \( {\displaystyle {\int}_0^{\infty }f(x)dx\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em 1.} \) This completes the proof of Lemma A.2.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## About this article

#### Received

#### Accepted

#### Published

#### DOI

### Keywords

- Characterization
- Folded student’s
*t*distribution - Order statistics
- Reverse hazard rate
- Truncated first moment
- Upper record values

### 2010 Mathematics Subject Classifications

- 60E05
- 62E10
- 62E15
- 62G30