 Review
 Open Access
Generating discrete analogues of continuous probability distributionsA survey of methods and constructions
 Subrata Chakraborty^{1}Email author
https://doi.org/10.1186/s4048801500286
© Chakraborty. 2015
 Received: 4 February 2015
 Accepted: 1 July 2015
 Published: 5 August 2015
Abstract
In this paper a comprehensive survey of the different methods of generating discrete probability distributions as analogues of continuous probability distributions is presented along with their applications in construction of new discrete distributions. The methods are classified based on different criterion of discretization.
Keywords
 Discrete analogue
 Reliability function
 Hazard rate function
 Competing risk
 Exponentiated distribution
 Maximum entropy
 Discrete pearson
 TX method
1. Introduction
Sometimes in real life it is difficult or inconvenient to get samples from a continuous distribution. Almost always the observed values are actually discrete because they are measured to only a finite number of decimal places and cannot really constitute all points in a continuum. Even if the measurements are taken on a continuous scale the observations may be recorded in a way making discrete model more appropriate.
In some other situation because of precision of measuring instrument or to save space, the continuous variables are measured by the frequencies of nonoverlapping class interval, whose union constitutes the whole range of random variable, and multinomial law is used to model the situation.
In categorical data analysis with econometric approach existence of a continuous unobserved or latent variable underlying an observed categorical variable is presumed. Categorical variable is the observed as different discrete values when the unobserved continuous variable crosses a threshold value. Therefore, the inference is based on observed discrete values which are only indicative of the intervals to which unobserved continuous variable belongs but not its true values. Hence this is a case where one makes use of a discretization of the underlying continuous variable.
In survival analysis the survival function may be a function of count random variable that is a discrete version of underlying continuous random variable. For example the length of stay in an observation ward is counted by number of days or survival time of leukemia patients counted by number of weeks. From these examples it is clear that the continuous life time may not necessarily always be measured on a continuous scale but may often be counted as discrete random variables.
More over often the continuous failure time data generated from a complex system poses more derivational problem than that of a discrete version of the underlying continuous one. Despite these discrete life time distributions played only a marginal role in reliability analysis. Therefore, there is a need to focus on more realistic discrete life time distributions (Rezaei Roknabadi et al. 2009). That is discretization of a continuous lifetime model is an interesting and intuitively appealing approach to derive a discrete lifetime model corresponding to the continuous one (Lai 2013).
From the above discussion it can be inferred that many a times in real world the original variables may be continuous in nature but discrete by observation and hence it is reasonable and convenient to model the situation by an appropriate discrete distribution generated from the underlying continuous models preserving one or more important traits of the continuous distribution.
Deriving discrete analogues (Discretization) of continuous distribution has drawn attention of researchers. In recent decades a large number of research papers dealing with discrete distribution derived by discretizing a continuous one have appeared in a scattered manner in existing statistical literatures.
There are several ways to derive discrete distribution from continuous ones. In the current published literature we could find only two papers that dealt with surveys of discrete analogues of continuous distributions though in a limited manner. These are Bracquemond and Gaudoin (2003) who devoted a section on discrete life time distributions derived from continuous one in their survey on discrete life time distributions and Lai (2013) who presented construction of discrete lifetime distributions from continuous one in his paper concerning issues of construction of discrete life time distribution
With above background the main motivation of this article is to present a comprehensive methodwise survey of the different techniques of discretization of continuous distributions, with examples of their applications in construction of discrete analogues.
In the section 2 of this article discretization of continuous distributions are discussed method wise including composite methods, which comprise two stages using two different methods in separate subsections. In section 3 a discussion on the discretization highlighting its need, limitations and also a final conclusion is presented. Throughout the paper continuous random variable to be discretized is denoted by X while its discrete analogue by Y and with respect to discrete life time characteristics Kemp’s (2004) convention is followed.
2. Discrete analogues
A continuous random variable may be characterized either by its probability density function (pdf), moment generating function (mgf), moments, hazard rate function etc. Basically cconstruction of a discrete analogue from a continuous distribution is based on the principle of preserving one or more characteristic property of the continuous one.
 I.
Difference equation analogues of Pearsonian differential equation.
 II.
Probability mass function (pmf) of Y retains the form of the pdf of X and support of Y is determined from full range of X.
 III.
Pmf of Y retains the form of the pdf of X and support of Y is determined from a subset of the range of X.
 IV.
Survival function (sf) of Y retains the form of the survival function of X and support of Y is determined from full range of X.
 V.
Cumulative distribution function (cdf) of Y retains the form of the cdf of X and support of Y is determined from a subset of the range of X.
 VI.
Hazard (failure) rate function of Y retains the form of the hazard (failure) rate function of X.
 VII.
Moments of Y and X up to a certain order coincides.
 VIII.
Any interval domain, any theoretically possible mean–variance pair for Y
 IX.
Two stage composite methods
2.1 Discrete analogue of pearsonian system
Though Pearson himself did not pursue the development of a discrete analogue of his continuous system, the difference Eq. in (1) was used by Carver (1919, 1923). But he too did not attempt a thorough examination of the discrete distributions arising from Eq. (1).

Ord (1967a, b, c, 1968) discussed discrete analogue of the Pearson continuous system by using the following difference equation:

$$ \frac{p_k{p}_{k1}}{p_k}=\frac{ak}{\left(a+{b}_0\right)+\left({b}_11\right)k+{b}_2k\left(k1\right)} $$

Discrete t distribution: Ord (1968) also derived discrete analogue of various types of Pearsonian distributions. In particular, proposed discrete t distribution as a particular case of type VII distribution. The pmf of his discrete t was

Gurland and Tripathi (1975) and Tripathi and Gurland (1977), studied the extended Katz family that satisfies the probability recurrence relation

$$ {p}_{k+1}=\frac{a+bk}{c+k}{p}_k\kern0.24em ,\kern0.36em k=0,\kern0.24em 1,\kern0.24em 2,\kern0.24em \dots $$

Sundt and Jewell (1981) investigated a family of distributions satisfying probability recurrence relation

(See also Willmot, 1988)$$ {p}_{k+1}=\frac{a+b+ak}{1+k}{p}_k\kern0.24em ,\kern0.36em k=0,\kern0.24em 1,\kern0.24em 2,\kern0.24em \dots $$
2.2 MethodologyII
The distribution generated using this technique may not always have a compact form due to the normalizing constant.
2.2.1 Good distribution
\( f(x)=\frac{1}{\theta^{\beta}\varGamma \beta }{x}^{\beta 1}{e}^{x/\theta } \) in Eq. (2) and replacing e ^{− 1/θ } = q and β − 1 = a.
This distribution was applied to model the population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters.
This distribution was extensively studied by Kulasekara and Tonkyn (1992) and Doray and Luong (1997).
The distribution in Eq. (3) is a special case of HurwtizLerch Zeta Distribution (Zornig and Altmann 1995; Doray and Luong 1997; Gupta et al. 2008). For HurwtizLerch Zeta functions see Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2000). (see also section 11.2.20 of Johnson et al. 2005).
Another related distribution is the discrete Pareto distribution, also known as the Riemann zeta distribution (see page 527, Johnson et al. 2005).
Jamjoom (2013) investigated order statistics of the above distribution (also investigated by Alhazzani 2012) both in the “i.i.d.” and “identical but not independent” cases.
2.2.2 General Dirichlet distribution

For λ _{ k } = log(k), the distribution reduces to Dirichlet series distribution with pmf

For a _{ k } = a and λ _{ k } = log(k), the distribution reduces to Zeta distribution with pmf

Putting λ _{ k } = k, e ^{− θ } = α, gives power series distribution with pmf

For a _{ k } = k ^{ a }, e ^{− θ } = q and λ _{ k } = − k reduces to Good distribution

For a _{ k } = k, λ _{ k } = − k ^{2} and θ = 1/2 discrete Pearson distribution mentioned in Byers and Shenton (1994) having pmf

The discrete Pearson III distribution of Haight (1957) is a special
Siromoney (1964) applied this distribution to model frequency distribution of the length of wet spells during the period 193262 in a place called Tambaram in southern India.
2.2.3 Discrete normal distribution
A discrete normal distribution was investigated by many authors including Lisman and Van Zuylen (1972); Kemp (1997); Liang (1999); and Szablowski (2001).
This distribution is characterized by maximum entropy for specified mean and variance, and integer support on (−∞, + ∞). It can be derived as the distribution of the difference of two related Heine distribution (Benkherouf and Bather 1988; see also section 4.12.6 of Johnson et al. 2005 and references therein)
Weighted distribution of discrete normal with parameter (λ, q) with weight function of the form π ^{ x } is again discrete normal (πλ, q).
The distribution is log concave and unimodal like normal distribution.
Harris et al. (2001) applied this distribution in dynamic analysis of rural retail establishment count data.
2.2.4 Discrete exponential distribution
This is the geometric distribution with pmf
P(Y = k) = (1 − p)p ^{ k }, k = 0, 1, 2, ⋯, where p = e ^{− λ }.
Sato et al. (1999) applied this distribution to model defect count distribution in semiconductor deposition equipment and defect count distribution per chips.
It can be easily checked that the pmf in Eq. (5) can be derived as a discrete analogue of exponential distribution by considering f(x) = λ e ^{− λx }, x > 0, in Eq. (2).
2.2.5 Discrete Gamma distribution
Sato et al. (1999) applied this distribution to model defect count distribution in semiconductor deposition equipment and defect count distribution per chips.
2.2.6 Discrete log normal distribution
This distribution was applied to model four extremely skewed count data sets namely Text data from the English Bible, Sales data from a large retailer chain, Telecommunications data customer data from an AT&T service of monthly usage volumes, and Click stream data and browsing behavior of internet users.
2.2.7 Discrete half normal distribution
This can be seen as discretization of continuous half normal in the same way as in section 2.2.3. It can arises as a limiting q hyperPoissonI (Kemp 2002) distribution and also as a mixture of Heine distributions (Benkherouf and Bather 1988).
Khorashiadizadeh et al. (2012) referred this distribution as discrete truncated normal. For an approximation result on this distribution see Byers and Shenton (1994).
2.2.8 Discrete Laplace (double exponential)
This distribution inherits many properties of its continuous counterpart namely unimodality, infinite divisibility, maximum entropy distrbution for given absolute moment. Also arises as the difference of two i.i.d. geometric random variables.
This distribution can be derived as a discrete analogue of Laplace distribution by considering
\( f(x)=\frac{1}{2\sigma } \exp \left(\leftx\right/\sigma \right), \) in Eq. (2) and substituting, e ^{− 1/σ } = p.
Inusah and Kozubowski (2006) applied this distribution in modelling different currency exchange rate data. Meyer et al. (2013) applied it for estimating YSTR haplotype frequencies.
2.2.9 Discrete Skew Laplace
Where e ^{− 1/σ } = p and e ^{− 1/kσ } = q, p є (0, 1) and q є (0, 1).
For p = q Eq. (8) reduces to Eq. (7). Arises as the difference of two independently but not identically distributed geometric random variables.
This distribution was also applied for modeling currency exchange rates.
Another discrete distribution that generalizes the discrete skew Laplace distribution was proposed by Lekshmi and Sebastian (2014). This new Generalized Discrete Laplace distribution can be derived as the difference of two independently distributed negative binomial (NB) random variables with same dispersion parameter.
2.2.10 Discrete generalized exponential distribution
Where \( C={\displaystyle \sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\left(\begin{array}{l}\alpha 1\\ {}\kern0.36em j\end{array}\right)\frac{{\left(1\right)}^j\;{p}^j}{1{p}^{1+j}}},\kern0.5em {e}^{\lambda }=p \)
Nekoukhou et al. (2012) applied this distribution to model rank frequencies of graphemes in a Slavic language called ‘Slovene’.
Among the various distribution described in section 2.2 above, discrete normal in section 2.2.3, discrete half normal in section 2.2.7 and discrete Laplace distribution in section 2.2.8 can also be classified as generated to preserve the maximum entropy property of their continuous counterpart.
2.3 MethodologyIII
This is a modification of the methodII (Barbiero 2010). Here the discrete analogue is derived to have a finite support.
Suppose X is a continuous random variable with pdf f _{ X }(x), − ∞ < x < ∞. Y is the discrete analogue with the support consisting of k points to be derived from the range of X. Let g = (1 − k)/2, k odd positive integer and y _{ i } = g − 1 + i, i = 1, 2, ⋯, k.
For an example consider the case of discretizing X. Let \( {c}_i=\varPhi \left({y}_i\right),\kern0.36em {y}_i={F}_X^{1}\left({c}_i\right), \) where Φ(y _{ i }) is the cdf of N(0, 1) and F _{ X }() is the cdf of the X.
Barbiero (2010) gave examples of discrete gamma with 5 points and Weibull with 9 points support.
This method generates discrete analogue of continuous distribution with limited support like beta distribution. Here if X is symmetrical then Y retains expected value of X and pmf of Y retains the structure of the pdf of X.
For this method to be implemented the continuous cdf must be invertible, the support of the resulting discrete distribution may not be set of integers.
Barbiero (2010) has applied this method to estimate the reliability of systems for which stress and strength are defined as complex functions, and whose reliability is not derivable through analytic techniques.
2.3.1 Discrete power function distribution
Where \( c\left(n,j\right)={\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n{k}^{\alpha }=}\frac{B_{j+1}\left(n+1\right){B}_{j+1}}{j+1},\kern0.5em {B}_m(x) \) is the i ^{th} Bernoulli Polynomial defined as \( {B}_m(x)={\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^m{B}_k(x)\;{x}^{mk}}. \)
This distribution can model bathtubshaped hazard rate as well as upsidedown bathtubshaped mean residual life. They studied various other reliability properties and applied this model to fit a mortality data.
2.4 MethodologyIV
Following Kemp’s (2004) convention here we consider the definition of the discrete sf defined as S _{ Y }(k) = P(Y ≥ k) and accordingly the cdf F _{ Y }(k) = P(Y ≤ k) is related to the sf as S _{ Y }(k) = 1 − F _{ Y }(k − 1).
[Since for continuous random variable X, P(X = x) = 0 and F _{ X }(k) = 1 − S _{ X }(k)]
The method can be viewed deriving a discrete concentration (Roy 2003) of the random variable X and also as a process of time discretization (Bracquemond and Gaudoin 2003) in the context of X representing life. It is possibly the easiest method of construction.
The resulting pmf will be in a compact form if the continuous sf is in compact form. This method preserves the sf that is S _{ Y }(k) = S _{ X }(k).
One limitation of this technique is the concentration on the left limit of the equal intervals in which the support of the continuous random variable is partitioned.
(see Lai 2012; Bracquemond and Gaudoin 2003).
It may be noted here that = ⌈X⌉ = ⌊X⌋ + 1.
2.4.1 Discrete exponential distribution
2.4.2 Discrete Weibull distribution
Weibull distribution is widely accepted failure model but in practice, the failure data are often measured in discrete time such as cycles, blows, shocks, or revolutions. Discrete Weibull was proposed to find a discrete distribution corresponding to the Weibull.
If X _{1}, X _{2}, ⋯, X _{ n } are i.i.d. discrete Weibull in Eq. (10) then min(X _{1}, X _{2}, ⋯, X _{ n }) is also a discrete Weibull. (see also Almalki (2014).
Khan et al. (1989) and Kulasekara (1994) considered estimation of this distribution. Englehardht and Li (2011) applied this distribution in modeling microbial counts. See also Bakouch et al. (2012) and Khorashiadizadeh et al. (2012) for applications.
2.4.3 Discrete geometric Weibull distribution
2.4.4 Discrete normal distribution
An application of the distributions for evaluating the reliability of complex systems was elaborated as an alternative to simulation methods Roy (2003).
2.4.5 Discrete Rayleigh distribution
If X ~ Rayleigh distribution then its pdf and sf are respectively given by
f _{ X }(x) = (x/σ ^{2}) exp[−x ^{2}/2σ ^{2}] and sf S _{ X }(x) = exp[−x ^{2}/2σ ^{2}], x > 0.
This is a particular case of the discrete Weibull distribution of Nakagawa and Osaki (1975) stated in section 2.4.2.
Roy (2004) applied this distribution in reliability modeling and in approximating probability integrals arising out of a reliability analysis in continuous setting.
2.4.6 Discrete Maxwell distribution
If X ~ Maxwell distribution then its pdf and sf are respectively given by
\( {f}_X(x)=\frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi }}\frac{1}{\;{\theta}^{3/2}}{x}^2\;{e}^{{x}^2/\theta } \) and sf \( {S}_X(x)=1\frac{\varGamma \left(3/2,\;{x}^2/\theta \right)}{\varGamma \left(3/2\right)},\kern0.5em x>0. \)
where \( Q\left(k,2,\theta \right)={\displaystyle \underset{k}{\overset{k+1}{\int }}{u}^2{e}^{\left({u}^2/\theta \right)}du}. \)
2.4.7 Discrete extended exponential distribution (Telescopic)
If X ~ extended exponential distribution then its pdf and sf are respectively given by
\( {f}_X(x)=\alpha\;{g}_{\theta}^{/}(x)\;{e}^{\alpha\;{g}_{\theta}^{/}(x)}, \) and sf \( {S}_X(x)={e}^{\alpha\;{g}_{\theta }(x)},\kern0.5em \alpha,\;x>0. \)
Where g _{ θ }(x) is a strictly increasing function of x with g _{ θ }(0) = 0 and g _{ θ }(x) → ∞ as x → ∞ (Rezaei Roknabadi 2000, 2006).
Rezaei Roknabadi et al. (2009) obtained the pmf of their telescopic distribution by discretizing the extended exponential distribution as
\( P\left(Y=k\right)={q}^{g_{\theta }(k)}{q}^{g_{\theta}\left(k+1\right)},\;k=0,\;1,\;2,\cdots, \) where q = e ^{− α }, 0 < q < 1
 i.
\( {g}_{\theta}^{*}(y)={g}_{\theta}\left(y+1\right){g}_{\theta }(y) \) is an increasing function of y.
 ii.
For every sequence \( \left\{{q}^{g_{\theta}\left(i+y\right)}{q}^{g_{\theta }(y)}\right\},\;i=0,\;1,\;2,\cdots \) is decreasing
 iii.
For all j _{1}, j _{2}, k _{1}, k _{2} ∈ {0, 1, ⋯} such that j _{1} < j _{2} and k _{1} < k _{2}
 iv.
{g _{ θ }(y)}, y = 0, 1, ⋯ is convex.
Further by taking \( {T}_{\theta }(y)=\frac{1}{2}\left\{2{g}_{\theta}\left(y+1\right){g}_{\theta }(y){g}_{\theta}\left(y+2\right)\right\} \) it was proved by that the family is IFR (DFR) iff T _{ θ }(y) > (<) 0 and CFR iff T _{ θ }(y) = 0.
 i.
Discrete exponential
 ii.
Discrete Rayleigh
 iii.
Discrete Weibull
 iv.
Discrete Linear Exponential
 v.
Discrete Gompertz
This class of distribution was reinvestigated under the name discretized general class of continuous distribution in the chapter IV of a Masters Thesis by AlMasoud (2013).
 i.
Discrete Modified Weibull Extension Distribution: By taking g _{ θ }(x) = exp(x/θ)^{ β } − 1. The pmf is of the form
from which the discretized model of Chen (2000) is derived by putting θ = 1.
 ii.
Discrete Modified Weibull Type I Distribution: By taking g _{ θ }(x) = (δ/α)x + x ^{ β }. The pmf is given by
 iii.
Discrete Modified Weibull Type II Distribution: By taking g _{ θ }(x) = e ^{ α x } x ^{ β }. The pmf is given by
This is a discretized version of the Modified Weibull Type II Distribution Lai et al. (2003) having sf S _{ X }(x) = exp[−λx ^{ β } e ^{ αx }}], x > 0, λ > 0, α, β > 0 after appropriate reparameterization. Reliability characteristics and parameter estimation of the above particular cases are also discussed in detail by AlMasoud (2013).
 iv.
Discrete Reduced Modified Weibull: By taking \( {g}_{\theta }(x)=\sqrt{x}\left(1+b{c}^x\right). \) Almalki (2014) derived this distribution starting with continuous modified Weibull (Almalki 2014) having respective pdf and sf
and \( \begin{array}{l}{S}_X(x)= \exp \left[\alpha \sqrt{x}\beta \sqrt{x}{e}^{\lambda x}\right],\;x>0,\;\alpha,\;\beta,\;\lambda >0\\ {}\kern4.5em ={q}^{\sqrt{x}\left(1+b{c}^x\right)},\;x>0,\;\alpha,\;\beta,\;\lambda >0\end{array} \)
For b = 0 the distribution in Eq. (11) reduces to Discrete Weibull of Nakagawa and Osaki (1975) (see section 2.4.2 of this paper). Almalki (2014) applied this distribution to fit four data sets and compared the results with discrete Weibull, discrete additive Weibull and discrete modified Weibull distributions (see also Almalki and Nadarajah (2014).
2.4.8 Discrete Burr distribution
Krishna and Pundir (2009) studied discrete Burr distribution by considering X ~ Burr distribution with pdf and sf
f _{ X }(x) = αβx ^{ α − 1}/(1 + x ^{ α })^{ β + 1}, x > 0, α, β > 0 and S _{ X }(x) = (1 + x ^{ α })^{− β } respectively.
Where θ = e ^{− β }. See also Khorashiadizadeh et al. (2012).
2.4.9 Discrete Pareto distribution
Krishna and Pundir (2009) derived the discrete Pareto distribution as a particular case of their discrete Burr distribution putting α = 1 in the pmf in Eq. (12).
An application in reliability estimation in series system and a real data example on dentistry using this distribution is also discussed.
2.4.10 Discrete inverse Weibull distribution
Where q = e ^{− a }. They studied its distributional and reliability properties and parameter estimation.
Application of this model in lifetimes of certain electronic devices was also considered by Jazi et al. (2010).
2.4.11 Discrete Inverse Rayleigh distribution
Hussain and Ahmad (2014) applied this distribution to model two real life count data.
2.4.12 Discrete Lindley distribution
Bakouch et al. (2012) again reinvestigated this distribution and studied many additional properties of extensively.
This distribution was applied to model the collective risk model when both number of claims and size of a single claim are included in the model.
2.4.13 Discrete generalized exponential distribution
They applied this distribution to model a discrete data se related to accidents of 647 women working on Shells for 5 weeks.
This distribution was first mentioned in Jiang (2010) and later independently derived as exponentiatedexponential–geometric distribution using TX method in Alzaatreh et al. (2012), as an exponentiated geometric in Chakraborty and Gupta (2015).
2.4.14 Discrete gamma distribution
Where \( \varGamma \left(n,x/\theta \right)=\frac{1}{\theta^n}{\displaystyle \underset{x}{\overset{\infty }{\int }}{u}^{n1}{e}^{u/\theta }du}={\displaystyle \underset{x/\theta }{\overset{\infty }{\int }}{u}^{n1}{e}^{u}du} \)
Where Γ(n, k/θ, (k + 1)/θ) = Γ(n, k/θ) − Γ(n, (k + 1)/θ).
The authors studied many properties including classification of failure rate and applied this distribution in empirical modelling of two discrete failure time data related to computer break down and time to death of leukemia patients.
2.4.15 Discrete BurrIII distribution
They have established the characterization property that distribution of the minimum order statistic from a sample of size n is Discrete Burr III distribution (c, θ ^{ n }) iff the sample is from Discrete Burr III distribution (c, θ).
Para and Jan (2014) reinvestigated exactly the same distribution.
2.4.16 Discrete loglogistic distribution
It is a special case of discrete Burr distribution obtained by putting θ = e ^{− 1} in the pmf in Eq. (13). Khorashiadizadeh et al. (2012).
2.4.17 Discrete generalized gamma distribution
and sf S _{ X }(x) = (1/Γn)Γ _{ n }((x/θ)^{ c }) respectively.
Where \( {\varGamma}_n\left({\left(t/\theta \right)}^c\right)={\displaystyle {\int}_{{\left(t/\theta \right)}^c}^{\infty }{v}^{n1}{e}^{v}dv} \) \( =\left(c/{\theta}^{cn}\right){\displaystyle {\int}_t^{\infty }{u}^{cn1}{e}^{\left(u/\theta \right)n}du} \)
and \( {\varGamma}_n(a)={\displaystyle {\int}_a^{\infty }{v}^{n1}{e}^{v}dv} \) being the upper incomplete gamma function.
Where \( {\varGamma}_n\left({\left(k/\theta \right)}^c,{\left(\left(k+1\right)/\theta \right)}^c\right)=\left(c/\left({\theta}^{cn}\right)\right)\kern0.24em {\displaystyle {\int}_{\;k}^{\;k+1}{u}^{cn1}{e}^{{\left(u/\theta \right)}^c}du}\;. \)
A number of existing and new distributions are seen as particular cases the discrete generalized gamma distribution dγ (n, θ, c) for various values of the parameters n, θ and c.
 i.
c = 1, discrete gamma distribution dγ (n,θ) (Chakraborty and Chakravarty 2012).
 ii.
n = 1, discrete Weibull distribution (Nakagawa and Osaki 1975).
 iii.
c = 1 and θ = 1, One parameter discrete gamma distribution dγ(n) with pmf P(Y = k) = (1/Γn)Γ(n, k, (k + 1)) (Chakraborty and Chakravarty 2012).
 iv.
c = 1 and n = 1, geometric distribution with pmf P(Y = k) = q ^{ k } − q ^{ k + 1} = (1 − q) q ^{ k }, k = 0, 1, 2, ⋯, where q = e ^{− 1/θ }.
 v.
c = 2, a discrete hydrograph distribution with pmf \( P\left(Y=k\right)=2/{\theta}^{2n}\varGamma k\;{t}^{cn1}\;{e}^{{\left(t/\theta \right)}^c}. \)
 vi.
c = 2 and n ← n/2, discrete generalized Rayleigh distribution
 vii.
c = 2, k = 1, discrete Rayleigh distribution (Roy 2004).
 viii.
c = 2, n = 3/2 and \( \theta \leftarrow \sqrt{\theta }, \) discrete MaxwellBoltzmann Krishna and Pundir (2007) distribution with pmf
 ix.
c = 2 and n = 1/2, discrete halfNormal distribution
 x.
Large n, μ = log θ + (1/c)log n and \( \sigma =1/c\sqrt{n}, \) discrete lognormal distribution with pmf
Chakraborty (2015a) has shown that this distribution is IFR if c > 1 , DFR if k ≤ 1, c < 1 and CFR if k = 1, c = 1 . Application of the distribution in modelling two real life count data sets was also demonstrated by the author.
2.4.18 Discrete Logistic distribution
Chakraborty and Chakravarty (2013) applied this distribution to model a real life count data in Z.
Khorashiadizadeh et al. (2012) considered the monotonic behavior of log odd ratio for standard discrete logistic distribution and discrete truncated logistic distribution and their relation with IFR class. They have also considered several other discrete lifetime distributions such as discrete Burr XII, Discrete log logistic (Krishna and Pundir 2009), Discrete Weibull (Nakagawa and Osaki 1975), discrete half normal Kemp et al. (2006). Discrete truncated logistic distribution was also considered in Bracquemond and Gaudoin (2003).
2.4.19 Another Discrete Skew Laplace distribution
This distribution was applied to model two real life count data.
2.4.20 Discrete Gumbel distribution
and S(x) = 1 − exp[−e ^{− (x − μ)/σ } ] respectively.
After the reparameterization p = e ^{− 1/σ } and α = p ^{− μ }.
They investigated the distributional, reliability and monotonic properties, different parameter estimation methods.
Chakraborty and Chakravarty (2014) applied this distribution to model three real life count data related to maximum flood discharges and annual maximum wind speeds from literature.
2.4.21 Discrete Additive Weibull distribution
This distribution is IFR if θ ≥ 1 and γ > 1 (θ > 1 and γ ≥ 1), DFR if θ ≤ 1 and γ < 1 (θ < 1 and γ ≤ 1) and is bathtub shaped if θ < 1 < γ (γ < 1 < θ) (see also Almalki 2014).
2.4.22 Discrete power distribution
Where a, b and a ≤ m ≤ b are integers, and n is any positive real number. Some of its important distributional and reliability properties were investigated. Estimation methods of parameters were presented.
For more on general continuous triangular and twosided power distributions see Zocchi and Kokonendji (2013) and for application of discrete triangular distribution in kernel estimation for discrete functions see Kokonendji and Zocchi (2010).
2.5 MethodologyV
Where the parameter 0 < δ < 1 is so chosen that the first two raw moments of X and Y remains close (Roy and Dasgupta 2001). Except for a shift in the location by δ the pmf in Eq. (14) preserves the form of the original cdf.
The choice of number of point of discretization is derived from a compromise between the accuracy and computational load of the results. Hence for reducing computational overload number of points should be small say 3 and for increasing accuracy the number of points should be large say 9.
Applied in approximating system reliability of complex systems under stressstrength model.
2.5.1 Discrete Ade’s distribution
follows Ade’s distribution with parameters n, θ, b.
Perry and Taylor (1985) fitted this distribution to 22 entomological data sets with encouraging results.
2.6 MethodologyVI
Note that here the range of Y that is value of m is determined so as to satisfy the condition that 0 ≤ λ _{ X }(x) < 1 and multiply every P(Y = k) by a positive normalizing constant to ensure the total probability equals to 1. Such a choice of is not going to affect the functional form of the failure rate. This approach though was highlighted by Roy and Ghosh (2009) was in fact used by Stein and Dattero way back in 1984 and preserves failure (hazard) rate function.
Bracquemond and Gaudoin (2003) though maintained that failure distribution with bounded support appears unrealistic from the point of view of applications since one cannot sure to ascertain that a system will necessarily fail in less than m counts.
2.6.1 Discrete Weibull
Note that the distribution in Eq. (15) and the discrete Weibull defined in Eq. (10) coincides and reduces to geometric distribution when c = 1 − q and β = 1. Khan et al. (1989) dealt with the estimation of the parameters of this distribution.
A connection is shown to the famous Birthday Problem and to the lifetime of a series system of components.
2.6.2 Discrete Rayleigh
So the effective support of the discrete Rayleigh will have to be determined from the condition that 0 ≤ λ _{ X }(x) < 1 which in this case implies 0 ≤ x < σ ^{2}. Thus if we take σ ^{2} = 2, the range of X will be 0 ≤ X < 2.
2.6.3 Discrete Lomax
So the effective support of the discrete Lomax (Roy and Ghosh 2009) will have to be determined from the condition that 0 ≤ λ _{ X }(y) < 1 which in this case implies y ≥ α − β.
For details regarding above method of construction see Roy and Ghosh (2009) who have applied the above two distributions to approximate the reliability of complex systems approximating reliability under a stress strength model where exact determination of survival probability is analytically intractable.
2.6.4 Another Discrete Weibull
Hence \( {\lambda}_Y(k)=1 \exp \left[{\lambda}_Y^{*}(k)\right]. \)
For this distribution \( {\lambda}_Y(k)=1{e}^{c\;{k}^{\beta 1}} \) and \( {\lambda}_Y^{*}(k)=c\;{k}^{\beta 1},k=1,\;2,\cdots; \kern0.24em \beta \in R;\kern0.24em c\in {R}^{+}. \) Lai (2013) also derived a discrete inverse Weibull using this method. See also Almalki (2014); Lai (2013) and Bracquemond and Gaudoin (2003).
Barbiero et al. (2013) discussed parameter estimation by different methods for this distribution in details with applications of real data fitting showing how the type III discrete Weibull distribution can fit real data.
2.7 MethodologyVII
Approximation of some classical probability distribution
Distribution  Abscissa  Probability  Weight  Polynomial 
N(μ, σ ^{2})  \( \mu +\sigma\;{x}_j^{(GH)} \)  \( \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi }}{w}_j^{(GH)} \)  exp(−x ^{2}), − ∞ < x < ∞  GH 
gamma (t, α)  \( \frac{1}{\alpha}\;{x}_j^{(GLa)} \)  \( \frac{1}{\varGamma t}{w}_j^{(GLa)} \)  \( {x}^{t{1}^{\prime }} \exp \left(x\right),\;0<x<\infty \)  GLa 
beta (α, β)  \( \frac{\left(1+{x}_j^{(GJ)}\right)}{2} \)  \( \frac{t^{1\alpha \beta}\;{w}_j^{(GJ)}}{beta\;\left(\alpha, \beta \right)} \)  \( \frac{{\left(1x\right)}^{\alpha 1}}{{\left(1+x\right)}^{1\beta }},1<x<1 \)  GJ 
uniforn(a, b)  \( a+\frac{ba}{2\left(1+{x}_j^{(GLe)}\right)} \)  \( \frac{1}{2}{w}_j^{(GLe)} \)  1, − 1 < x < 1  GLe 
The gamma (t, α) distribution has mean t/ α and variance t/ α ^{2}; the superscript GaussHermite (GH), GaussLaguerre (GLa), GaussJacobi (GJ) and GaussLegendre (GLe) refer to the polynomial names; the subscript j varies in {1, 2, …, N}.
This method may require solution of system of nonlinear equations in addition to the requirement of the existence of moments of the continuous distribution.
2.8 MethodologyVIII
(i) E(X) = E(Y) and (ii) Var(X) ≤ Var(Y) ≤ Var(X) + min{E(X), 1/4}.
Note that F _{ Y }(y) is actually the average of F _{ X }(.) in the interval (n, n + 1) under assumption of uniform distribution in that interval. Hagmark (2008) asserted that every count variable is a discretization of an initial continuous random variable which is seldom unique. He gave example initial continuous distribution of which Poisson distribution is a discretized version and algorithms to generate discrete distributions using this method.
2.9 Two stage composite methods
2.9.1 Discretized Exponentiated models
Thus basically first the continuous distribution function is exponentiated and the resulting exponentiated continuous distribution is then discretized by using the methodologyIV.
Which is the distribution mentioned in Eq. (13) and again later in Eq. (20). (see Mudholkar et al. (1995) for exponentiated Weibull).
Remark 1. One can use the exponentiation of sf and then discretize to get different analogues. Also one can use other methodologies instead of method III to generate different discrete analogues of the exponentiated continuous distributions.
2.9.2 Twofold competing risk models
In this method (Jiang 2010) first two continuous random variables X _{1} and X _{2} having sfs \( {S}_{X_1}(x) \) and \( {S}_{X_2}(x) \) are combined to produce a new random variable X having sf \( {S}_X(x)={S}_{X_1}(x){S}_{X_2}(x). \)
Where \( {P}_{X_i}\left(Y=k\right)={S}_{X_i}(k){S}_{X_i}\left(k+1\right) \) is the discrete analogue of the continuous random variable X _{1}. Clearly, the random variable X is equal to minimum {X _{1}, X _{2}}.
Discrete additive Weibull distribution discussed in the section 2.4.21 can be seen as an example of this construction.
 i.
Obviously, one can generalize this to more than two i.e. manifold competing risk models model.
 ii.
Discretized exponentiated method can be seen as a particular case of this method when the X’s are identical.
2.9.3 Marshall and Olkin followed by methodIII
2.9.3.1 Generalization of the geometric distribution
2.9.3.2 Discrete half normal
GómezDéniz et al. (2014) proposed a discrete version of the halfnormal distribution by using this scheme of discretization and investigated its generalization with applications.
2.9.4 TX method
As such we can see that this method is essentially employing discretization method on the TX pdf to generate new discrete distribution.
In particular if X is a geometric random variable with parameter p = e ^{− 1} = 0.3679, then pmf of the Tgeometric family reduces to P(Y = k) = F _{ T }(k + 1) − F _{ T }(k), k = 0, 1, 2, … (see section 2.5).
Alzaatreh et al. (2012) proved many properties of this family including the unimodality of the T geometric family given that the nonnegative continuous random variable T is unimodal with a unique mode.
Note that, if α = 1, i.e. the random variable T has exponential distribution, and then the EEGD reduces to the geometric distribution. Also observe the similarity of Eq. (21) with Eqs. in (13) and (16).
2.9.5 Generalization of the TX method
Obviously Eq. (22) reduces to Eq. (19) when W(x) = − log(1 − x).
Akinsete et al. (2014) considered T as the Kumaraswamy (1980) distribution with cdf
Note that for β = 1, Eq. (23) reduces to Eq. (21). Akinsete et al. (2014) also proved that this distribution can also be derived by considering logKumararswamy distribution instead of Kuamarswamy distribution and taking W(x) = − log(1 − x).
2.9.6 Method of discretization after transmutation
F _{ Z }(z) = (1 + α)(1 − e ^{− βz }) − α(1 − e ^{− βz })^{2}, z > 0, β > 0, − 1 < α < 1 (Shaw and Buckley, 2007).
with e ^{− β } = q. This is the transmuted geometric distribution proposed recently by Chakraborty (2015b) and studied in detail by Chakraborty and Bhati (2015).
3. Discussion and conclusions
3.1. Benefits of discretization of continuous probability distribution
When only an approximating discrete random variable is observable, estimation procedures employing the hypothetical continuous random variables are sometime biased and hence a discrete distribution is more appropriate for an observed data (Holland 1975).
Discretization of continuous distribution may be looked upon as a filtering process which may help in reducing of noise present in the data. Especially data sets having a high amount of background noise can gain from this process.
Discretization may bring in computational easiness.
3.2 Limitation of discretization of continuous probability distribution
When a continuous probability density function is discretized to a probability mass function there will always be some loss of information. As such one should try to strike a balance between the need for discretization and resulting loss of information or accuracy. Also attention should be paid to select the best one among the available techniques of discretization. Some of the criteria for selection mentioned in Bracquemond and Gaudoin (2003) are simple and flexible expressions, physical basis for the distribution, interpretation of model parameter, and efficiency of estimators.
3.3 Concluding remarks
The discretization of a continuous distribution using different methods has attracted renewed attention of researchers in last few years. Though a large number of such distributions are now available in the literature, still new discrete analogues are being added to the existing collection. There is still enough scope to contribute new discrete versions using different methods since not all methods received same attention of the researchers. This article is aimed at providing up to date information on this vibrant research topic. Future research in this area may be to search for different constructions that might ensure preservation of multiple characteristics of the continuous distribution in its discretized version, developing inferential procedures for these discrete analogues etc. among others. We have not discussed detail properties of the methods and discretized distributions presented in this survey as those can accessed from the respective original references.
Declarations
Acknowledgement
Author would like to acknowledge the remarks and suggestions made by various research scholars and scientists in the International Conference on Statistical Data Mining for Bioinformatics, Health, Agriculture and Environment, at Rajshahi University, Bangladesh during December 22 − 24, 2012 where an earlier version of this paper was first presented as an Invited talk.
Author would also like to acknowledge the anonymous referee and editor for their comments and suggestions on the first draft of this paper which lead to substantial improvements in presentation.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Akinsete, A, Famoye, F, Lee, C: The KumaraswamyGeometric distribution. J. Stat. Distributions. Appl. 1, 17 (2014)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Alhazzani, NS: Modeling discrete life data in reliability and its applications. Master thesis. King Saud University, Riyadh (2012)Google Scholar
 AlHuniti, AA, ALDayian, GR: Discrete Burr type III distribution. Am. J. Math. Stat. 2(5), 145–152 (2012). doi:10.5923/j.ajms.20120205.07 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Almalki, SJ: Statistical analysis of lifetime data using new modified Weibull distributions, a thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences. (2014)Google Scholar
 Almalki, SJ, Nadarajah, S: A new discrete modified Weibull distribution. IEEE. Trans. Reliability. 63(1), 66–180 (2014). doi:10.1109/TR.2014.2299691 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 AlMasoud, TA: A discrete general class of continuous distributions. Master of Science (Statistics) thesis. Faculty of Science, King Abdul Aziz University, JeddahSaudi Arabia (2013)Google Scholar
 Alzaatreh, A, Lee, C, Famoye, F: On the discrete analogue of continuous distributions. Stat. Methodol 9, 589–603 (2012)MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Alzaatreh, A, Lee, C, Famoye, F: A new method for generating families of continuous distributions. Metron 71, 63–79 (2013)MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Bakouch, HS, Jazi, MA, Nadarajah, S: A new discrete distribution. Statistics, iFirst, 141 (2012). doi/10.1080/02331888.2012.716677
 Barbiero, A: A discretizing method for reliability computation in complex stressstrength models. World. Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 47, 75–81 (2010)Google Scholar
 Barbiero, A: An Alternative discrete skew Laplace distribution. Stat. Methodol 16, 47–67 (2014)MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Barbiero, A: Parameter estimation for type III discrete Weibull distribution: a comparative study. J. Probab. Stat., Volume 2013, Article ID 946562, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/946562
 Bebbington, M, Lai, CD, Wellington, M, Zitikis, R: The discrete additive Weibull distribution: a bathtub shaped hazard for discontinuous failure data. Reliability Engineering and System Safety (2012)Google Scholar
 Benkherouf, L, Bather, JA: Oil exploration: sequential decisions in the face of uncertainty. J. Appl. Probability. 25, 529–543 (1988)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Bi, Z, Faloutsos, C, Korn, F: The “DGX” distribution for mining massive skewed data. 7th Conf. on Knowledge discovery and data Mining, San Francisco (2001)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Bracquemond, C, Gaudoin, O: A survey on discrete life time distributions. Int. J. Reliabil. Qual. Saf. Eng. 10, 69–98 (2003)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Byers, Jr, RH, Shenton, LR: Surprising approximations to the halfnormal. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 49(3), 215–216 (1994)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Carver, HC: On the graduation of frequency distributions. Proc. Casual. Actuarial. Soc. Am. 6, 52–72 (1919)Google Scholar
 Carver, HC: Frequency curves. Handbook of Mathematical Statistics. Rietz, HL (editor), Cambridge MA: Riverside, 92119 (1923)Google Scholar
 Chakraborty, S: A new discrete distribution related to generalized gamma distribution and its properties. Commun. Stat. Theory. Methods. 44(8), 1691–1705 (2015). doi:10.1080/03610926.2013.781635 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Chakraborty, S, Chakravarty, D: Discrete gamma distributions: properties and parameter estimation. Commun. Stat. Theory. Methods. 41(18), 3301–3324 (2012)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Chakraborty, S, Chakravarty, D: A discrete Gumbel distribution. arXiv:1410.7568 [math.ST], 28 Oct 2014Google Scholar
 Chakraborty, S, Chakravarty, D: A discrete two sided power distribution. arXiv:1501.06299[math.ST], 26 Jan 2015Google Scholar
 Chakraborty, S, Chakravarty, D: A new symmetric discrete probability distribution with integer support on (∞, ∞). Published on line 12th August 2013, Communications in StatisticsTheory and Methods (2013)Google Scholar
 Chakraborty, S, Gupta, RD: Exponentiated geometric distribution: another generalization of geometric distribution. Commun. Stat. Theory. Methods. 44(6), 1143–1157 (2015). doi:10.1080/03610926.2012.763090 MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Chakraborty, S: Transmuted geometric distribution and its properties. arXiv:1502.04203 [math.ST], (2015b)Google Scholar
 Chakraborty, S, Bhati, D: Transmuted geometric distribution with applications in modeling and regression analysis of count data. Under review (2015)Google Scholar
 Chen, Z: A new two  parameter lifetime distribution with bathtub shape or increasing failure rate function. Stat. Probabil. Lett. 49(2), 155–161 (2000)View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Das Gupta, R: Cauchy equation on discrete domain and some characterizations. Theor. Probability. Appl. 38, 318–328 (1993)Google Scholar
 Doray, LG, Luong, A: Efficient estimators for the Good family. Comm. Statist. Simul. Comput. 26, 1075–1088 (1997)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Englehardht, JD, Li, R: The discrete Weibull distribution: an alternative for correlated counts with confirmation for microbial counts in water. Risk Anal. 31(3), 370–381 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 GómezDéniz, E: Another generalization of the geometric distribution. Test 19, 399–415 (2010)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 GómezDéniz, E, CalderinOjeda, E: The discrete Lindley distribution: properties and applications. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 81(11), 1405–1416 (2011)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 GómezDéniz, E, VazquezPolo, GarciaGarcia, V: A discrete version of the halfnormal distribution and its generalization with applications. Stat Papers 55(2), 497–511 (2014)View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Good, IJ: The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40, 237–264 (1953)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Gradshteyn, IS, Ryzhik, IM: Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products. Sixth Edition, Academic Press, London (2000)Google Scholar
 Gupta, RD, Kundu, D: Generalized exponential distributions. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 41(2), 173–188 (1999)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Gupta, P, Gupta, RC, Ong, SH, Srivastava, HM: A class of HurwitzLerch Zeta distributions and their applications in reliability. Appl. Math. Comput. 196, 521531 (2008)Google Scholar
 Gurland, J, Tripathi, RC: Estimation of parameters on some extensions of the Katz family of discrete distributions involving hypergeometric functions. Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work, Vol. 1: Models and Structures, Patil, GP, Kotz, S, Ord, JK (editors), 5982 (1975)Google Scholar
 Hagmark, PE: On construction and simulation of count data models. Math. Comput. Simul. 77, 72–80 (2008)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Haight, FA: Queueing with balking. Biometrika 44, 360–369 (1957)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Harris, TR, Shonkwlier, JS, Lin, Y: Application of discrete normal distribution for dynamic rural retail sector analysis: Selected paper at the annual AAEA meeting Chicago, Illinois, August 58. (2001)Google Scholar
 Holland, BS: Some Results on the discretization of continuous probability distributions. Technometrics 17(3), 333–339 (1975)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Hussain, T, Ahmad, M: Discrete inverse Rayleigh distribution. Pak. J. Statist. 30(2), 203–222 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Inusah, S, Kozubowski, TJ: A discrete analogue of the Laplace distribution. J. Stat. Planning. Inference. 136, 1090–1102 (2006)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Jamjoom, AA: Order statistics from discrete gamma distribution. J. Am. Sci. 9(7), 487–498 (2013)Google Scholar
 Jazi, MA, Lai, CD, Alamatsaz, MH: A discrete inverse Weibull distribution and estimation of its parameters. Stat. Methodol. 7(2), 121–132 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.stamet.11.001 MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Jiang, R: Discrete competing risk model with application to modeling busmotor failure data. Reliability. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 981–988 (2010)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Johnson, NL, Kemp, AW, Kotz, S: Univariate discrete distributions. Wiley, New York (2005)View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Katz, L: Characteristics of frequency functions defined by first order difference equations. PhD Thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1945)Google Scholar
 Katz, L: On the class of functions defined by the difference equation (x + 1) f (x + 1) = (a + bx) f (x). Ann. Math. Stat. 17, 501 (1946) (abstract)Google Scholar
 Katz, L: Frequency functions defined by the Pearson difference equation. Ann. Math. Stat. 19, 120 (1948) (abstract)Google Scholar
 Katz, L: Unified treatment of a broad class of discrete probability distributions. Classical and contagious discrete distributions. Patil, G.P., (editor), Calcutta: Statistical Publishing Society; Oxford: Pergamon, 175182 (1965)Google Scholar
 Kemp, AW: Characterization of a discrete normal distribution. J. Stat. Planning. Inference. 63, 223–229 (1997)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Kemp, CD: qAnalogues of the hyperPoisson distribution. J. Stat. Planning. Inference. 101, 179–183 (2002)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Kemp, AW: Classes of discrete lifetime distributions. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods. 33(12), 3069–3093 (2004)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Kemp, AW: The discrete halfnormal distribution. International Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Modeling in the Honor of Enrique Castillo, June 2830 (2006)Google Scholar
 Khan, MS, Khalique, A, Aboummoh, AM: On estimating parameters in a discrete Weibull distribution. IEEE. Trans. Reliability. 38(3), 348–350 (1989)View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Khorashiadizadeh, M, Rezaei Roknabadi, AH, Mohtashami Borzadaran, GR: Characterisation of life distributions using logodds rate in discrete ageing. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods. 42(1), 76–87 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kokonendji, CC, Zocchi, SS: Extensions of discrete triangular distributions and boundary bias in kernel estimation for discrete functions. Stat. Probabil. Lett. 80(21–22), 1655–1662 (2010)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Kozubowski, TJ, Inusah, S: A skew Laplace distribution on Integers. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 58, 555–571 (2006)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Krishna, H, Pundir, PS: Discrete Burr and discrete Pareto distributions. Stat. Methodol. 6, 177–188 (2009)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Krishna, H, Pundir, PS: Discrete Maxwell distribution. Interstat, http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2007/articles/0711003.pdf (2007)
 Kulasekara, KB: Approximate mle of the parameters of a discrete Weibull distribution with typeI censored data. Microelectron. Reliab. 34, 1185–1188 (1994)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kulasekara, KB, Tonkyn, DW: A new discrete distribution with application to survival, dispersal and dispersion. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 21, 499–518 (1992)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kumaraswamy, P: A generalized probability density function for doublebounded random processes. Hydrology 46, 79–88 (1980)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Lai, CD: Constructions and applications of lifetime distributions. Appl. Stochastic. Models. Bus. Ind. 29, 127–140 (2012)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Lai, CD: Issues concerning constructions of discrete lifetime models. Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag. 10(2), 251–262 (2013)Google Scholar
 Lai, CD, Wang, DQ: A finite range discrete life distribution. Int. J. Reliability. Qual. Saf. Eng. 2(2), 147–160 (1995)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Lai, CD, Xie, M, Murthy, DNP: A modified Weibull distribution. Reliability. IEEE. Trans. 52(1), 33–37 (2003)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Lekshmi, S, Sebastian, S: A skewed generalized discrete Laplace distribution. Int. J. Math. Stat. Invent. 2(3), 95–102 (2014)Google Scholar
 Liang, TC: Monotone empirical Bayes tests for a discrete normal distribution. Stat. Probabil. Lett. 44, 241–249 (1999)View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Lisman, JHC, Van Zuylen, MCA: Note on the generation of the most probable frequency distribution. Statistica Neerlandica 26, 19–23 (1972)View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Luceno, A: Discrete approximations to continuous univariate distributions – an alternative to simulation. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 61(2), 345–352 (1999)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Marshall, AW, Olkin, I: A new method for adding a parameter to a family of distributions with applications to the exponential and Weibull families. Biometrika 84(3), 641–652 (1997)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Meyer, M, Poul Svante, A, Morling, EN: A gentle introduction to the discrete Laplace method for estimating YSTR haplotype frequencies. arXiv:1304.2129v4 [stat.AP], 16 Oct 2013Google Scholar
 Mudholkar, GS, Srivastava, DK, Marshall, F: The exponentiated Weibull family: a reanalysis of the Busmotorfailure data. Technometrics 37(4), 436–445 (1995)View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Mukherjee, SP, Islam, A: A finiterange distribution of failure times. Naval. Res. Logistics. Quart. 30(3), 487–491 (1983)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Nakagawa, T, Osaki, S: The discrete Weibull distribution. IEEE. Trans. Reliability. R24(5), 300–301 (1975)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Nekoukhou, VM, Alamatsaz, MH, Bidram, H: Discrete generalized exponential distribution of the second type. Stat. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 47(4), 876–887 (2011). doi:10.1080/02331888.2011.633707 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Nekoukhou, VM, Alamatsaz, MH, Bidram, H: A discrete analog of the generalized exponential distribution. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods. 41, 2000–2013 (2012)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Nooghabi, MS, Roknabady, AHR, Borzadaran, GRM: Discrete modified Weibull distribution. Metron LXIX, 207–222 (2011)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ord, JK: On a system of discrete distributions. Biometrika 54, 649–656 (1967a)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Ord, JK: On Families of discrete distributions. Ph. D. University of London, Thesis, London (1967b)Google Scholar
 Ord, JK: The discrete Student’s t distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 39, 1513–1516 (1968)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Ord, JK: On families of discrete distributions. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of London (1967a)Google Scholar
 Padgett, WT, Spurrier, JD: On Discrete Failure Models. IEEE. Transaction on Reliability, R34 (3), 253256 (1985)Google Scholar
 Para, BA, Jan, TR: Discretization of BurrType III distribution. J. Reliability. Stat. Stud. 7(2), 87–94 (2014)Google Scholar
 Pearson, K: Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution I. Skew distribution in homogeneous material. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 186, 343–414 (1895)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Perry, JN, Taylor, LR: Ades: New ecological families of speciesspecific frequency distributions that describe repeated spatial samples with an intrinsic power law variancemean property. J. Anim Ecol. 54, 931–953 (1985)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Rezaei Roknabadi, AH: Some discrete life models. Ph. D. Thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashad, Iran (2000)Google Scholar
 Rezaei Roknabadi, AH: Characterisation and model selections through reliability measures in the discrete case. Stat. Probabil. Lett. 43, 197–206 (2006)Google Scholar
 Rezaei Roknabadi, AH, Mohtashami Borzadaran, GR, Khorashadizadeh, M: Some aspects of discrete telescopic hazard rate function in telescopic families. Econ. Qual. Control. 24(1), 35–42 (2009)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Roy, D: The discrete normal distribution. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods. 32(10), 1871–1883 (2003)View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Roy, D: Discrete Rayleigh distribution. IEEE. Trans. Reliability. 53(2), 255–260 (2004)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Roy, D, Dasgupta, T: A discretizing approach for evaluating reliability of complex systems under stressstrength model. IEEE. Trans. Reliability. 50(2), 145–150 (2001)MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Roy, D, Ghosh, T: A new discretization approach with application in reliability estimation. IEEE. Trans. Reliability. 58(3), 456–461 (2009)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Roy, D, Gupta, PL: Classifications of discrete lives. Microelectron. Reliab. 32(10), 1459–1473 (1992)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Sarhan, A, Zaindin, M: Modified Weibull distribution. Appl. Sci. 11, 123–136 (2009)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Sato, H, Ikota, M, Aritoshi, S, Masuda, H: A new defect distribution meteorology with a consistent discrete exponential formula and its applications. IEEE. Trans. Semicond. Manufactur. 12(4), 409–418 (1999)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Shaw, W, Buckley, I: The alchemy of probability distributions: beyond Gram Charlier expansions and a skewkurtoticnormal distribution from a rank transmutation map. Research report. (2007)Google Scholar
 Siromoney, G: The general Dirichlet’s series distribution. J. Indian. Stat. Assoc. 2 & 3, 69–74 (1964)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Stein, WE, Dattero, R: A new discrete Weibull distribution. IEEE. Trans. Reliability. R33(2), 196–197 (1984)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Sundt, B, Jewell, WS: Further results on recursive evaluation of compound distributions. ASTIN. Bull. 18, 27–39 (1981)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Szablowski, PJ: Discrete normal distribution and its relationship with Jacobi Theta functions. Stat. Probabil. Lett. 52, 289–299 (2001)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Tripathi, RC, Gurland, J: A general family of discrete distributions with hypergeometric probabilities. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 39, 349–356 (1977)MATHGoogle Scholar
 Van Drop, JR, Kotz, S: A novel extension of the triangular distribution and its parameter estimation. J. R. Stat. Soc. D. 51(1), 63–79 (2002a)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Van Drop, JR, Kotz, S: The standard two sided power distribution and its properties: with application in financial engineering. Am. Stat. 56(2), 90–99 (2002b)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Willmot, GE: Sundt and Jewell’s family of discrete distributions. ASTIN. Bull. 18, 17–29 (1988)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Xie, M, Tang, Y, Goh, TN: A modified Weibull extension with bathtubshaped failure rate function. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 76(3), 279–285 (2002)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Zacks, S: Estimating the shift to wearout of systems having exponential Weibull life. Oper. Res. 32, 741–749 (1984)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Zocchi, SS, Kokonendji, CC: On general continuous triangular and twosided power distributions. Communications in StatisticsTheory and Methods, In Press (2013). doi:10.1080/03610926.2013.824102.
 Zornig, P, Altmann, G: Unified representation of Zipf distributions. Comput. Statist. Data. Anal. 19, 461–473 (1995)MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar